linux-kernel - Raid not shutting down when disks are lost?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 8 Oct 2009 16:39:52 +0200
From:	Pierre Ossman <pierre-list@...man.eu>
To:	neilb@...e.de, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Raid not shutting down when disks are lost?

Today one RAID6 array I manage decided to lose four out of eight disks.
Oddly enough, the array did not shut down but instead I got
intermittent read and writer errors from the filesystem.

It's been some time since I had a failure of this magnitude, but I seem
to recall that once the array lost too many disks, it would shut down
and refuse to write a single byte. The nice effect of this was that if
it was a temporary error, you could just reboot and the array would
start nicely (albeit in degraded mode).

Has something changed? Is this perhaps an effect of using RAID6 (I used
to run RAID5 arrays)? Or was I simply lucky the previous instances I've
had?

Related, it would be nice if you could control how it handles lost
disks. E.g. I'd like it to go read-only when it goes in to fully
degraded mode. In case the last disk lost was only a temporary glitch,
the array could be made to recover without a lengthy resync.

Rgds
-- 
     -- Pierre Ossman

  WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
  Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
  for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
  encryption.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)