linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] SCSI fixes for 2.6.32-rc3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 8 Oct 2009 07:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] SCSI fixes for 2.6.32-rc3

On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> I'm taking it (and the parisc one I was also unhappy with)

Actually, looking at it again, I'm wavering.

That BFA driver isn't a "driver". It's a huge subsystem of it's own. It's 
almost 50 _thousand_ lines of code for just a single "driver", and for 
rare hardware at that.

Quite frankly, the "bang per line" is almost zero. 

What the ^&@* is wrong with "enterprise SCSI" people? The amount of crazy 
is overwhelming.

So I've pulled it, but I'm still considering just unpulling it. That 
driver is _not_ "just a driver".  It's something more. Something dank and 
smelly, that has grown in dark and forbidding places.

The whole crazy "high end SCSI" industry needs a f*cking exorcism.

Even if I don't unpull, I don't _ever_ want to see a driver like this 
outside the merge window. And dammit, James, you should have realized 
that.

			Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/