[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 18:32:35 -0700
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@...ibm.com>
Cc: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ibm.com>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
andrea@...share.com, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: pidns memory leak
Ccing Andrea's new email id:
Daniel Lezcano [dlezcano@...ibm.com] wrote:
> Following your explanation I was able to reproduce a simple program
> added in attachment. But there is something I do not understand is why
> the leak does not appear if I do the 'lstat' (cf. test program) in the
> pid 2 context.
Hmm, are you sure there is no leak with this test program ? If I put back
the commit (7766755a2f249e7), I do see a leak in all three data structures
(pid_2, proc_inode, pid_namespace).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists