[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 14:09:51 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
G@....cz, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@...radead.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.32-rc3
On Tue 2009-10-06 22:31:19, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 11:22:38AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >
> > Why don't you just have the kernel version Linux-commitid?
> >
> > why keep up the pretense that the 2.6.xx bit means anything outside of release?
> >
> > You could just have the tarball generation scripts make it into a 2.6.31 but
> > for everyone else we never see it.
>
> The tarball generation scripts for the daily snapshots already set
> EXTRAVERSION to -git15, -git16, etc.
>
> So the problem seems to be localized to those users/developers who are
> smart enough to use git, and dumb enough not to set
> CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO. So big of a set this actually is, I can't
> say. Do we have any statistics about how many bug reporters make this
> mistake?
I admit -- I did not know about LOCALVERSION_AUTO, and many times
wished -rc0 would be labeled as such.
Now...perhaps LOCALVERSION_AUTO should not be option? Just hardwire it
to Y? (But that still does not solve systems when someone, probably
me, did rm -rf .git, for space and speed reasons).
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists