linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pci tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:38:42 -0700
From:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pci tree with Linus' tree

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:05:32 +1100
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi Jesse,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the pci tree got a conflict in
> drivers/pci/pci.c between commit
> 8d86fb2c80ec376b35ae64ac858d406ae1d42a3f ("Rename pci_init() to
> pci_apply_final_quirks(), move it to quirks.c") from Linus' tree and
> commit b20dd110d21aac94b3f4063cffbcf9718656ce51 ("PCI: determine CLS
> more intelligently") from the pci tree.
> 
> I fixed it up by removing the bits of pci_init() that had been moved
> and leaving the newly added bits where they are.  Hopefully this will
> be ok since the moved bits are actually run earlier now.  Obviously,
> there is probably a better fix ...

Ah, thanks.  I'll check it out and update my linux-next branch.

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/