linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kernel.h: Add a never optimized away pr_dbg for printk(KERN_DEBUG pr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:44:12 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel.h: Add a never optimized away pr_dbg for
 printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt)...)

On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 21:28 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> The pr_dbg_* variations seem reasonable if the current pr_debug() were 
> changed to pr_dbg().

I think that's unlikely to happen.

> this discussion is irrelevant if there 
> are no current use cases (in which case the patch is pointless).

Yeah, right.  It's alway irrelevant to add new
facilities when where are no current use cases.

I sent a 21 deep patchset over a week ago.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/4/198


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/