lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:25:07 GMT
From:	"tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Stopgap fix for synchronize_rcu_expedited() for TREE_PREEMPT_RCU

Commit-ID:  019129d595caaa5bd0b41d128308da1be6a91869
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/019129d595caaa5bd0b41d128308da1be6a91869
Author:     Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:15:56 -0700
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:17:17 +0200

rcu: Stopgap fix for synchronize_rcu_expedited() for TREE_PREEMPT_RCU

For the short term, map synchronize_rcu_expedited() to
synchronize_rcu() for TREE_PREEMPT_RCU and to
synchronize_sched_expedited() for TREE_RCU.

Longer term, there needs to be a real expedited grace period for
TREE_PREEMPT_RCU, but candidate patches to date are considerably
more complex and intrusive.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: laijs@...fujitsu.com
Cc: dipankar@...ibm.com
Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca
Cc: josh@...htriplett.org
Cc: dvhltc@...ibm.com
Cc: niv@...ibm.com
Cc: peterz@...radead.org
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com
Cc: npiggin@...e.de
Cc: jens.axboe@...cle.com
LKML-Reference: <12555405592331-git-send-email->
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
 include/linux/rcutree.h |    6 +-----
 kernel/rcutree_plugin.h |   21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rcutree.h b/include/linux/rcutree.h
index 46e9ab3..9642c6b 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutree.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutree.h
@@ -76,11 +76,7 @@ static inline void __rcu_read_unlock_bh(void)
 
 extern void call_rcu_sched(struct rcu_head *head,
 			   void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu));
-
-static inline void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
-{
-	synchronize_sched_expedited();
-}
+extern void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void);
 
 static inline void synchronize_rcu_bh_expedited(void)
 {
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index c0cb783..ebd20ee 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -393,6 +393,17 @@ void call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu))
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_rcu);
 
 /*
+ * Wait for an rcu-preempt grace period.  We are supposed to expedite the
+ * grace period, but this is the crude slow compatability hack, so just
+ * invoke synchronize_rcu().
+ */
+void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
+{
+	synchronize_rcu();
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu_expedited);
+
+/*
  * Check to see if there is any immediate preemptable-RCU-related work
  * to be done.
  */
@@ -565,6 +576,16 @@ void call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu))
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_rcu);
 
 /*
+ * Wait for an rcu-preempt grace period, but make it happen quickly.
+ * But because preemptable RCU does not exist, map to rcu-sched.
+ */
+void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
+{
+	synchronize_sched_expedited();
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu_expedited);
+
+/*
  * Because preemptable RCU does not exist, it never has any work to do.
  */
 static int rcu_preempt_pending(int cpu)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ