linux-kernel - Re: Tips for module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:18:13 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To:	Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>
Cc:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Tips for module_init() dependencies

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:13:30 -0400 Gregory Haskins wrote:

> Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:58:19 -0400 Gregory Haskins wrote:
> > 
> >> Daniel Walker wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 09:01 -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> may break, because the kernel seems to have no concept of
> >>>> interdependency between foo_init() and bar_init(), and therefore
> >>>> bar_init() may call foo() before foo_init() has executed.
> >>>>
> >>>> There are various ways to solve this problem, such as deferring calling
> >>>> foo() with a workqueue or something, but I was wondering if there was a
> >>>> better/standard way to do this that I am missing?
> >>>>
> >>>> The problem I am having specifically is that I am trying to call
> >>>> configfs_register_subsystem() in a module_init(), but this breaks when
> >>>> built into the kernel based on sheer bad luck that configfs gets
> >>>> initialized after me.  To date I have worked around this by forcing my
> >>>> code to only support built-in, and using late_initcall() instead or
> >>>> module_init.  This works, but it only means I am putting the problem off
> >>>> (code that depends on *me* has to use similar tricks, etc.
> >>> You can't modify the build order so your module get "builtin" after
> >>> configfs?
> >>>
> >> Hi Daniel,
> >>
> >> Possibly.
> >>
> >> A) Any suggestions on how? Can I express this in Kconfig or something
> >> (i.e. "depends on FOO").  I currently have "select FOO" in the BAR
> >> object, but this doesn't seem to be sufficient to describe the relationship.
> > 
> > Not in Kconfig, only in Makefile(s).
> > and please put #comments in them explaining the ordering requirements/needs.
> 
> Hi Randy,
> 
> Something like this?
> 
> ----------
> 
> # cat drivers/bar/Makefile
> 
> bar.o: foo.o
> obj-$CONFIG_BAR += bar.o
> 
> ----------
> 
> ?

Just the order that they are listed in, either within one Makefile
or the order that a parent Makefile lists them, so:

obj-$CONFIG_FOO += foo.o
obj-$CONFIG_BAR += bar.o

That will fix the load/init ordering.  You may also need to specify
build dependencies in Kconfig file(s).


---
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/