lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:24:00 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>
CC:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	kurt.hackel@...cle.com, arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, chris.mason@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 05/12] xen/pvclock: add monotonicity check

On 10/14/09 20:26, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> As long as we are going through the trouble of making
> this monotonic, shouldn't it be monotonically increasing
> (rather than just monotonically non-decreasing)?  The
> rdtsc instruction and any suitably high-precision
> hardware timer will never return the same value
> on subsequent uses so this might be a reasonable
> precedent to obey.  E.g.
>
> +	return ret > xen_clocksource.cycle_last ?
> +		ret : ++xen_clocksource.cycle_last;
>   

No, cycle_last isn't updated on every read, only on timer ticks.  This
test doesn't seem to be intended to make sure that every
clocksource_read is globally monotonic, but just to avoid some boundary
conditions in the timer interrupt.  I just copied it directly from
read_tsc().

    J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ