linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] serial/atmel_serial: Fix another fallout of the change to BUILD_BUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:19:40 +0100
From:	"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...ell.com>
To:	"Rusty Russell" <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:	"Haavard Skinnemoen" <haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com>,
	"Haavard Skinnemoen" <hskinnemoen@...el.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Alan Cox" <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial/atmel_serial: Fix another fallout of the
	 change to BUILD_BUG_ON

>>> Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> 19.10.09 08:08 >>>
>How's this?  It's not quite valid C, but it "works":

But that's not what you proposed initially, i.e. generating a link time
error if a compile time error can't be generated (and only if even a link
time error isn't possible, a run time one should be forced).

And btw., why do you think this isn't valid C?

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/