linux-kernel - Re: libaio asynchronous syscall io

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:59:04 -0400
From:	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To:	Zubin Dittia <zubin@...tri.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: libaio asynchronous syscall io_getevents blocks on error

Zubin Dittia <zubin@...tri.com> writes:

> But this does bring up the interesting question of how to know which
> of the I/Os I submitted had an error, and what the error was.  Does it

If io_submit returned N, then the N+1 iocb had an error.

> PS: It does seem a little strange that io_submit returns an error if
> the first IOCB is invalid but not when any of the other IOCBs are
> invalid (this appears to be the case, at least according to the man
> page).

It makes sense that it tells you how many it could successfully submit.
If it can't submit any, you get the error from the first I/O.

Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/