lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:27:51 +0200
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	"Leonidas ." <leonidas137@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Can current macro be accessed from interrupt context?

On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 04:10:49AM -0700, Leonidas . wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Going through UTLK, it says that current macro makes sense only in
> case of process context,
> in case of interrupt context it is invalid.


Indeed, usually it makes only sense in process context.

 
> But current would still be pointing to interrupted process right? The
> pointer would still be valid?



Yeah, unless you irq handler executes in a threaded interrupt, in
which case current will be pointing to the given irq thread.

There are few tiny cases where it is unsafe to deref "current",
such as the very beginning of a cpu's awakening, when the per cpu
datas are not yet ready for this cpu.


> Can I safely assume that whether or not interrupt handlers are
> executing on separate stacks or
> interrupted threads stack, current macro can be accessed from interrupt context?


Yep.
For example we do that in the function graph tracer. Because we store return
addresses of functions in the "current" task structure. Even if the task
is interrupted, it still makes sense to use current because we want
to know the flow of execution as a linear thing per cpu, the interrupt
is part of that flow

I hope that helps.

Frederic.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ