| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:56:59 +0800 From: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com> To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> Cc: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, lenz@...wisc.edu, kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Dirk@...er-online.de, arminlitzel@....de, Cyril Hrubis <metan@....cz>, thommycheck@...il.com, linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, dbaryshkov@...il.com, omegamoon@...il.com, utx@...guin.cz Subject: Re: spitz backlight: fix brightness limiting On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote: > On Thu 2009-10-22 23:43:19, Richard Purdie wrote: >> On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 04:20 +0800, Eric Miao wrote: >> > It's a little bit weird it's called 'limit_mask' when I first converted it >> > to a spi driver. There must be some reasons, Richard, you've got >> > any ideas? >> >> Its a historical artifact that once worked through some bitfield magic >> but probably stopped working when we increased the range of values the >> backlight could accept and we didn't notice the limiting problem. >> >> I'll happily take a patch to fix that. > > Patch is available in the parent post. For now, I just fix it so that > it does not turn backlight off when it should not. I'll submit > limit_mask -> limit as separate patch, ok? I'm fine with that. Feel free to. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists