linux-kernel - Re: Hyperthreading on 4 core CPU DECREASES performance???

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:24:39 +0000
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Igor Chudov <ichudov@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Hyperthreading on 4 core CPU DECREASES performance???

> This is Ubuntu Hardy, 2.6.24 kernel. I tried the same with 2.6.31,
> with the same effect.
> 
> This article from Intel:
> 
> http://software.intel.com/sites/oss/pdfs/mclinux.pdf
> 
> It talks about intelligent handling of multiple cores as a done deal,
> but in my experience that did not actually occur.
> 
> I would like to know how can I make the scheduler to prefer to spread
> the tasks across physical cores as opposed to bundling two on one core
> and leaving some cores idle.

The scheduler will try and do balancing for packages and for HT. Make
sure your distribution is built with the SCHED_SMT and SCHED_MC options
enabled. Some of the non-enterprise distirbutions may well not have these
enabled.

For hand laying out threads see: man pthread_setaffinity_np

The win from HT depends a lot on the CPU and also the workload mix. In
some workloads it will decrease performance.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/