lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:34:09 +0900
From:	Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
CC:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pci: only release that resource index is less than
 3 -v5

Yinghai Lu wrote:
> after
> 
> | commit 308cf8e13f42f476dfd6552aeff58fdc0788e566
> |
> |    PCI: get larger bridge ranges when space is available
> 
> found one of resource of peer root bus (0x00) get released from root
> resource. later one hotplug device can not get big range anymore.
> other peer root buses is ok.
> 
> it turns out it is from transparent path.
> 
> those resources will be used for pci bridge BAR updated.
> so need to limit it to 3.
> 
> v2: Jesse doesn't like it is in find_free_bus_resource...
>     try to move out of pci_bus_size_bridges loop.
> need to apply after:
> 	[PATCH] pci: pciehp update the slot bridge res to get big range for pcie devices - v4
> v3: add pci_setup_bridge calling after pci_bridge_release_not_used_res.
>     only clear release those res for x86.
> v4: Bjorn want to release use dev instead of bus.
> v5: Kenji pointed out it will have problem with several level bridge.
>     so let only handle leaf bridge.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> 
> ---
>  arch/x86/pci/i386.c              |    6 ++
>  drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_pci.c |    2 
>  drivers/pci/setup-bus.c          |   81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/linux/pci.h              |    2 
>  4 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> @@ -319,6 +319,42 @@ static void pci_bridge_check_ranges(stru
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +void pci_bridge_release_not_used_res(struct pci_bus *bus)
> +{
> +	int idx;
> +	bool changed = false;
> +	struct pci_dev *dev;
> +	struct resource *r;
> +	unsigned long type_mask = IORESOURCE_IO | IORESOURCE_MEM |
> +				  IORESOURCE_PREFETCH;
> +
> +	/* for pci bridges res only */
> +	dev = bus->self;
> +	for (idx = PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES; idx < PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES + 3;
> +	    idx++) {

If this function is only for normal PCI bridge, we need additional
check at the head of this function.

	if ((dev->class >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_CARDBUS)
		return;

if not, 3 should be 4 instead. And we can do as follows

        for (i = PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCE; i <= PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCE_END; i++) {

> +		r = &dev->resource[idx];
> +		if (r->flags & type_mask) {

How about
		if (!(r->flags & type_mask))
			continue;

> +			if (!r->parent)
> +				continue;
> +			/*
> +			 * if there is no child under that, we should release
> +			 * and use it.
> +			 */

I think this comment should be updated because whether "we should
release and use it" is decided by the caller of this function.

> +			if (!r->child && !release_resource(r)) {
> +				dev_info(&dev->dev,
> +					 "resource %d %pRt released\n",
> +					 idx, r);
> +				r->flags = 0;
> +				changed = true;
> +			}

How about
		if (r->child)
			continue;

		if (!release_resource(r)) {
			...
		}

> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	if (changed)
> +		pci_setup_bridge(bus);

The pci_setup_bridge() is called even if some resources are used
by children. For example, mem resource is used by children, but
prefetchable mem resource is not used by children. In this case,
I think mem resource is released and pci_setup_bridge() is called
while prefetcable mem resource is being used. I'm worrying that it
might cause something wrong.

> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_bridge_release_not_used_res);
> +
>  /* Helper function for sizing routines: find first available
>     bus resource of a given type. Note: we intentionally skip
>     the bus resources which have already been assigned (that is,
> @@ -576,6 +612,48 @@ void __ref pci_bus_size_bridges(struct p
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_bus_size_bridges);
>  
> +
> +/* only release those resources that is on leaf bridge */
> +void __ref pci_bus_release_bridges_not_used_res(struct pci_bus *bus)
> +{
> +	struct pci_dev *dev;
> +	bool is_leaf_bridge = true;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) {
> +		struct pci_bus *b = dev->subordinate;
> +		if (!b)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		switch (dev->class >> 8) {
> +		case PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_CARDBUS:
> +			is_leaf_bridge = false;
> +			break;
> +
> +		case PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI:
> +		default:
> +			is_leaf_bridge = false;
> +			pci_bus_release_bridges_not_used_res(b);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	/* The root bus? */
> +	if (!bus->self)
> +		return;
> +
> +	switch (bus->self->class >> 8) {
> +	case PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_CARDBUS:
> +		break;
> +
> +	case PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI:
> +	default:
> +		if (is_leaf_bridge)
> +			pci_bridge_release_not_used_res(bus);
> +		break;
> +	}
> +}

How about like below. This might need to be called with "pci_bus_sem" held.

void __ref pci_bus_release_bridges_not_used_res(struct pci_bus *bus)
{
        struct pci_bus *b;

        /* If the bus is cardbus, do nothing */
        if (bus->self && (bus->self->class >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_CARDBUS)
                return;

        /* We only release the resources under the leaf bridge */
        if (list_empty(&bus->children)) {
                if (!pci_is_root_bus(bus))
                        pci_bridge_release_not_used_res(bus);
                return;
        }

        /* Scan child buses if the bus is not leaf */
        list_for_each_entry(b, &bus->children, node)
		pci_bus_release_bridges_not_used_res(b);
}

> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_bus_release_bridges_not_used_res);
> +
>  void __ref pci_bridge_assign_resources(const struct pci_dev *bridge)
>  {
>  	struct pci_bus *b;
> @@ -644,7 +722,8 @@ static void pci_bus_dump_res(struct pci_
>  
>          for (i = 0; i < PCI_BUS_NUM_RESOURCES; i++) {
>                  struct resource *res = bus->resource[i];
> -                if (!res || !res->end)
> +
> +		if (!res || !res->end || !res->flags)
>                          continue;
>  
>  		dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, &bus->dev, "resource %d %pRt\n", i, res);
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_pci.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_pci.c
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_pci.c
> @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ int pciehp_configure_device(struct slot
>  		pci_dev_put(dev);
>  	}
>  
> +	pci_bridge_release_not_used_res(parent);

I guess this is for the slots that are empty at the boot time on non x86
systems. And it only works at the first hot-add. Correct? How about doing
this at the pciehp's slot initialization.


>  	pci_bus_size_bridges(parent);
>  	pci_clear_master(bridge);
>  	pci_bridge_assign_resources(bridge);
> @@ -171,6 +172,7 @@ int pciehp_unconfigure_device(struct slo
>  		}
>  		pci_dev_put(temp);
>  	}
> +	pci_bridge_release_not_used_res(parent);

How about call pci_bus_release_bridges_not_used_res() instead and
make pci_bridge_release_not_used_res() static function.

>  
>  	return rc;
>  }
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/pci.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -759,6 +759,8 @@ int pci_vpd_truncate(struct pci_dev *dev
>  void pci_bridge_assign_resources(const struct pci_dev *bridge);
>  void pci_bus_assign_resources(const struct pci_bus *bus);
>  void pci_bus_size_bridges(struct pci_bus *bus);
> +void pci_bus_release_bridges_not_used_res(struct pci_bus *bus);
> +void pci_bridge_release_not_used_res(struct pci_bus *bus);
>  int pci_claim_resource(struct pci_dev *, int);
>  void pci_assign_unassigned_resources(void);
>  void pdev_enable_device(struct pci_dev *);
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/pci/i386.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/pci/i386.c
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/pci/i386.c
> @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ static void __init pcibios_allocate_reso
>  static int __init pcibios_assign_resources(void)
>  {
>  	struct pci_dev *dev = NULL;
> +	struct pci_bus *bus;
>  	struct resource *r;
>  
>  	if (!(pci_probe & PCI_ASSIGN_ROMS)) {
> @@ -213,6 +214,11 @@ static int __init pcibios_assign_resourc
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	/* Try to release bridge resources, that there is not child under it */
> +	list_for_each_entry(bus, &pci_root_buses, node) {
> +		pci_bus_release_bridges_not_used_res(bus);
> +	}
> +

If this is only for PCIe hotplug, I don't think we need it here (as
you're doing for non x86 platforms). If not, I think you should do
it in the another patch.

Thanks,
Kenji Kaneshige


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists