linux-kernel - Re: pull request: wireless-next-2.6 2009-10-28

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:23:27 +0100
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-next-2.6 2009-10-28

On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 10:10 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> So i have read the thread you and Bartlomiej referenced:
> 
>     http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/17/81
> 
> ... and my understanding of that discussion is very different from 
> yours. Here is my annotated history of the beginnings of that 
> discussion:

[snip]

You shouldn't ignore all previous interaction between Bart and us --
which wasn't pretty: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/901892

Of course we were biased when he came around with that petty code
duplication argument, since it seemed to support only his agenda of
working only with the staging drivers.

johannes

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)