linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] page allocator: Do not allow interrupts to use ALLOC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:46:48 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, stable@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	Sven Geggus <lists@...hsschwanzdomain.de>,
	Karol Lewandowski <karol.k.lewandowski@...il.com>,
	Tobias Oetiker <tobi@...iker.ch>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@...net.com>,
	kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] page allocator: Do not allow interrupts to use
 ALLOC_HARDER

On Tue, 3 Nov 2009, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> If you dont know what "realtime" is then we cannot really implement
> "realtime" behavior in the page allocator.
> 

It's not intended to implement realtime behavior!

This is a convenience given to rt_task() to reduce latency when possible 
by avoiding direct reclaim and allowing background reclaim to bring us 
back over the low watermark.

That's been in the page allocator for over four years and is not intended 
to implement realtime behavior.  These tasks do not rely on memory 
reserves being available.

Is it really hard to believe that tasks with such high priorities are 
given an exemption in the page allocator so that we reclaim in the 
background instead of directly?

I hope we can move this to another thread if people would like to remove 
this exemption completely instead of talking about this trivial fix, which 
I doubt there's any objection to.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/