linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/41] rewritten rt2800 drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 5 Nov 2009 09:55:39 +1100
From:	Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>
To:	Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@...il.com>
Cc:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/41] rewritten rt2800 drivers

Bart,

FWIW, this all looks good to me, except for these comments:

1. When you introduce struct rt2800_ops, it may telegraph your
intentions more clearly if you introduce rt2800lib.h at the same time
- this also means that we don't have (if only for a single patch)
duplicate versions of this structure and it's associated code.

2. Patches #26-28 should arguably come before the conversions to use
the struct rt2800_ops methods.

3. I don't get the reasoning behind patch #37 (remove useless ifdefs
from rt2x00leds.h) but I'm going to assume that it's all right.

4. Patch #39 should arguably come earlier in the patch set as it's a
general cleanup.

Other than that, good work!

Thanks,

-- 

Julian Calaby

Email: julian.calaby@...il.com
.Plan: http://sites.google.com/site/juliancalaby/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/