lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091105124111.GC12770@duck.suse.cz>
Date:	Thu, 5 Nov 2009 13:41:11 +0100
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/27] BKL: Remove BKL from ext2 filesystem

On Mon 02-11-09 11:04:45, Jan Blunck wrote:
> The BKL is still used in ext2_put_super(), ext2_fill_super(), ext2_sync_fs()
> ext2_remount() and ext2_write_inode(). From these calls ext2_put_super(),
> ext2_fill_super() and ext2_remount() are protected against each other by
> the struct super_block s_umount rw semaphore. The call in ext2_write_inode()
> could only protect the modification of the ext2_sb_info through
> ext2_update_dynamic_rev() against concurrent ext2_sync_fs() or ext2_remount().
> ext2_fill_super() and ext2_put_super() can be left out because you need a
> valid filesystem reference in all three cases, which you do not have when
> you are one of these functions.
  This is not quite true. Actually, ext2_sync_fs() is called also with
s_umount held (for reading) so it cannot race with any of the mounting /
umounting functions. But it should probably be guarded against running two
instances of ext2_sync_fs() in parallel.
  Looking into the code, we probably have a race in ext2_write_inode that
two threads can write one inode in parallel. But that's a separe issue from
BKL removal.

								Honza 

> diff --git a/fs/ext2/inode.c b/fs/ext2/inode.c
> index 057074e..8b51416 100644
> --- a/fs/ext2/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext2/inode.c
> @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@
>   *  Assorted race fixes, rewrite of ext2_get_block() by Al Viro, 2000
>   */
>  
> -#include <linux/smp_lock.h>
>  #include <linux/time.h>
>  #include <linux/highuid.h>
>  #include <linux/pagemap.h>
> @@ -1400,13 +1399,11 @@ int ext2_write_inode(struct inode *inode, int do_sync)
>  			       /* If this is the first large file
>  				* created, add a flag to the superblock.
>  				*/
> -				lock_kernel();
>  				mutex_lock(&EXT2_SB(sb)->s_mutex);
>  				ext2_update_dynamic_rev(sb);
>  				EXT2_SET_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(sb,
>  					EXT2_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_LARGE_FILE);
>  				mutex_unlock(&EXT2_SB(sb)->s_mutex);
> -				unlock_kernel();
>  				ext2_write_super(sb);
>  			}
>  		}
> diff --git a/fs/ext2/super.c b/fs/ext2/super.c
> index d610eb9..7e819ac 100644
> --- a/fs/ext2/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext2/super.c
> @@ -26,7 +26,6 @@
>  #include <linux/random.h>
>  #include <linux/buffer_head.h>
>  #include <linux/exportfs.h>
> -#include <linux/smp_lock.h>
>  #include <linux/vfs.h>
>  #include <linux/seq_file.h>
>  #include <linux/mount.h>
> @@ -118,8 +117,6 @@ static void ext2_put_super (struct super_block * sb)
>  	int i;
>  	struct ext2_sb_info *sbi = EXT2_SB(sb);
>  
> -	lock_kernel();
> -
>  	if (sb->s_dirt && !(sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY))
>  		ext2_sync_fs(sb, 1);
>  
> @@ -143,8 +140,6 @@ static void ext2_put_super (struct super_block * sb)
>  	sb->s_fs_info = NULL;
>  	kfree(sbi->s_blockgroup_lock);
>  	kfree(sbi);
> -
> -	unlock_kernel();
>  }
>  
>  static struct kmem_cache * ext2_inode_cachep;
> @@ -750,8 +745,6 @@ static int ext2_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
>  	__le32 features;
>  	int err;
>  
> -	lock_kernel();
> -
>  	err = -ENOMEM;
>  	sbi = kzalloc(sizeof(*sbi), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!sbi)
> @@ -1077,7 +1070,6 @@ static int ext2_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
>  		ext2_warning(sb, __func__,
>  			"mounting ext3 filesystem as ext2");
>  	ext2_setup_super (sb, es, sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY);
> -	unlock_kernel();
>  	return 0;
>  
>  cantfind_ext2:
> @@ -1102,7 +1094,6 @@ failed_sbi:
>  	kfree(sbi->s_blockgroup_lock);
>  	kfree(sbi);
>  failed_unlock:
> -	unlock_kernel();
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1140,7 +1131,6 @@ static int ext2_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
>  {
>  	struct ext2_super_block *es = EXT2_SB(sb)->s_es;
>  
> -	lock_kernel();
>  	if (es->s_state & cpu_to_le16(EXT2_VALID_FS)) {
>  		ext2_debug("setting valid to 0\n");
>  		es->s_state &= cpu_to_le16(~EXT2_VALID_FS);
> @@ -1154,7 +1144,6 @@ static int ext2_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
>  		ext2_commit_super(sb, es);
>  	}
>  	sb->s_dirt = 0;
> -	unlock_kernel();
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -1181,7 +1170,6 @@ static int ext2_remount (struct super_block * sb, int * flags, char * data)
>  	unsigned long old_sb_flags;
>  	int err;
>  
> -	lock_kernel();
>  	mutex_lock(&sbi->s_mutex);
>  
>  	/* Store the old options */
> @@ -1221,14 +1209,12 @@ static int ext2_remount (struct super_block * sb, int * flags, char * data)
>  	}
>  	if ((*flags & MS_RDONLY) == (sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)) {
>  		mutex_unlock(&sbi->s_mutex);
> -		unlock_kernel();
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  	if (*flags & MS_RDONLY) {
>  		if (le16_to_cpu(es->s_state) & EXT2_VALID_FS ||
>  		    !(sbi->s_mount_state & EXT2_VALID_FS)) {
>  			mutex_unlock(&sbi->s_mutex);
> -			unlock_kernel();
>  			return 0;
>  		}
>  		/*
> @@ -1258,7 +1244,6 @@ static int ext2_remount (struct super_block * sb, int * flags, char * data)
>  	}
>  	ext2_sync_super(sb, es);
>  	mutex_unlock(&sbi->s_mutex);
> -	unlock_kernel();
>  	return 0;
>  restore_opts:
>  	sbi->s_mount_opt = old_opts.s_mount_opt;
> @@ -1266,7 +1251,6 @@ restore_opts:
>  	sbi->s_resgid = old_opts.s_resgid;
>  	sb->s_flags = old_sb_flags;
>  	mutex_unlock(&sbi->s_mutex);
> -	unlock_kernel();
>  	return err;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 1.6.4.2
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ