linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/11] sysctl: Separate the binary sysctl logic into it's own file.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 06 Nov 2009 03:33:31 -0800
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] sysctl: Separate the binary sysctl logic into it's own file.

Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com> writes:

> Am Freitag 06 November 2009 01:41:44 schrieb Eric W. Biederman:
>> From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
>> 
>> In preparation for more invasive cleanups separate the core
>> binary sysctl logic into it's own file.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
>
> Hmm, with your patches on Linus git I get the following on s390:
>
> kernel/sysctl_binary.c: In function 'SYSC_sysctl':
> kernel/sysctl_binary.c:126: error: implicit declaration of function 
> 'lock_kernel'
> kernel/sysctl_binary.c:129: error: implicit declaration of function 
> 'unlock_kernel'

Bah.  A missing smp_lock.h.

Thanks.
Eric

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/