| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:53:22 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [RFC -tip] x86,apic: Do not use stacked physid_mask_t * Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > during the conversation about physid_mask_t passed > via stack > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/11/8/139 > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/11/8/244 > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/11/9/43 > > the idea of moving masks via pointers not just for > x86-64 (we even don't use those masks there but still > have function declarations in struct apic) but for x86-32 > as well (ie more naturally -- as we operate with "struct cpumask") > found to be usefull. > > As a result -- the following patch. Note that it's > big enough and though I was trying to be carefull > I would really appreciate more detailed review and > comments and _complains_ as well. No complaints from me - this is the cleanup i was striving for. Will let you know if i see any test failures. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists