[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:34:50 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/atm: move all compat_ioctl handling to atm/ioctl.c
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 14:30 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> +struct atmif_sioc32 {
> + compat_int_t number;
> + compat_int_t length;
> + compat_caddr_t arg;
> +};
> +
> +struct atm_iobuf32 {
> + compat_int_t length;
> + compat_caddr_t buffer;
> +};
We already have compat_atmif_sioc and compat_atm_iobuf structures
defined -- do those need to be duplicated?
Other than that, it looks sane. I wish I'd noticed that we already had
half a COMPAT implementation when I added the new bits. Thanks.
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@...el.com Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists