linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/6] gta02: set pcf50633 charger_reference_current

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:26:21 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	Paul Fertser <fercerpav@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ben Dooks <ben@...tec.co.uk>,
	Anton Vorontsov <cbou@...l.ru>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] gta02: set pcf50633 charger_reference_current_ma

On Thu 2009-11-12 21:59:47, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 08:40:59AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Wed 2009-11-11 18:31:43, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 04:48:44PM +0300, Paul Fertser wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > Ben, please give us an advice on how to proceed with this rather
> > > > trivial patch. Anton doesn't merge the other patches from this series
> > > > because we do not know via which tree to merge this particular patch.
> > > 
> > > Paul, I'll just merge the whole patch set but skip this particular
> > > patch.
> > 
> > Feel free to merge that patch, too. It is clearly related to the
> > other stuff, and Russell being totally unresponsive should not be
> > reason to block patches.
> > 
> > He is the maintainer, he was cc-ed, and at this point it is quite
> > clear that he does not care.
> 
> Err, WTF?  How do you come to the conclusion that I'm somehow related
> to Samsung stuff, or GTA03 stuff?  Oh, that's right, you don't let facts
> get in the way of blaming me for something.

Ok, you are right, Ben is listed as Samsung maintainer. Accept my
apologies. The rest stands: Anton should just take the patch, because
maintainer does not care.

Actually, given that Ben is unresponsive, it should be either you or
Anton taking the patch; so if you prefer, you can take it.

> I've been ignoring this because as far as I can see, it's got nothing
> to do with me, and therefore its pointless me acking it.
> 
> Really Pavel, just take a moment to get your facts straight before you
> start blaming people.

Now, you still are arm maintainer, and that includes arch-msm. There's
nice series in your inbox for week+ -- HTC Dream support. There's also
Daniel Walker who is willing to maintain the architecture. Can we get
the patches applied (or some other decision?).  Pavel

-- (english)
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/