Date:	Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:40:04 -0500
From:	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
To:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	Sven Geggus <lists@...hsschwanzdomain.de>,
	Karol Lewandowski <karol.k.lewandowski@...il.com>,
	Tobias Oetiker <tobi@...iker.ch>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@...net.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] make crypto unplug fix V3

On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 05:34:46PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 07:58:12AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> > This is still likely to set your dm data on fire.  It is only meant for
> > testers that start with mkfs and don't have any valuable dm data.
> > 
> 
> The good news is that my room remains fire-free. Despite swap also
> running from dm-crypt, I had no corruption or instability issues.

Ok, definitely not so convincing I'd try and shove it into a late rc.

> 
> Here is an updated set of results for fake-gitk running.
> 
> X86
> 2.6.30-0000000-force-highorder           Elapsed:12:08.908    Failures:0
> 2.6.31-0000000-force-highorder           Elapsed:10:56.283    Failures:0
> 2.6.31-0000006-dm-crypt-unplug           Elapsed:11:51.653    Failures:0
> 2.6.31-0000012-pgalloc-2.6.30            Elapsed:12:26.587    Failures:0
> 2.6.31-0000123-congestion-both           Elapsed:10:55.298    Failures:0
> 2.6.31-0001234-kswapd-quick-recheck      Elapsed:18:01.523    Failures:0
> 2.6.31-0123456-dm-crypt-unplug           Elapsed:10:45.720    Failures:0
> 2.6.31-revert-8aa7e847                   Elapsed:15:08.020    Failures:0
> 2.6.32-rc6-0000000-force-highorder       Elapsed:16:20.765    Failures:4
> 2.6.32-rc6-0000006-dm-crypt-unplug       Elapsed:13:42.920    Failures:0
> 2.6.32-rc6-0000012-pgalloc-2.6.30        Elapsed:16:13.380    Failures:1
> 2.6.32-rc6-0000123-congestion-both       Elapsed:18:39.118    Failures:0
> 2.6.32-rc6-0001234-kswapd-quick-recheck  Elapsed:15:04.398    Failures:0
> 2.6.32-rc6-0123456-dm-crypt-unplug       Elapsed:12:50.438    Failures:0
> 2.6.32-rc6-revert-8aa7e847               Elapsed:20:50.888    Failures:0
> 
> X86-64
> 2.6.30-0000000-force-highorder           Elapsed:10:37.300    Failures:0
> 2.6.31-0000000-force-highorder           Elapsed:08:49.338    Failures:0
> 2.6.31-0000006-dm-crypt-unplug           Elapsed:09:37.840    Failures:0
> 2.6.31-0000012-pgalloc-2.6.30            Elapsed:15:49.690    Failures:0
> 2.6.31-0000123-congestion-both           Elapsed:09:18.790    Failures:0
> 2.6.31-0001234-kswapd-quick-recheck      Elapsed:08:39.268    Failures:0
> 2.6.31-0123456-dm-crypt-unplug           Elapsed:08:20.965    Failures:0
> 2.6.31-revert-8aa7e847                   Elapsed:08:07.457    Failures:0
> 2.6.32-rc6-0000000-force-highorder       Elapsed:18:29.103    Failures:1
> 2.6.32-rc6-0000006-dm-crypt-unplug       Elapsed:25:53.515    Failures:3
> 2.6.32-rc6-0000012-pgalloc-2.6.30        Elapsed:19:55.570    Failures:6
> 2.6.32-rc6-0000123-congestion-both       Elapsed:17:29.255    Failures:2
> 2.6.32-rc6-0001234-kswapd-quick-recheck  Elapsed:14:41.068    Failures:0
> 2.6.32-rc6-0123456-dm-crypt-unplug       Elapsed:15:48.028    Failures:1
> 2.6.32-rc6-revert-8aa7e847               Elapsed:14:48.647    Failures:0
> 
> The numbering in the kernel indicates what patches are applied. I tested
> the dm-crypt patch both in isolation and in combination with the patches
> in this series.
> 
> Basically, the dm-crypt-unplug makes a small difference in performance
> overall, mostly slight gains and losses. There was one massive regression
> with the dm-crypt patch applied to 2.6.32-rc6 but at the moment, I don't
> know what that is.

How consistent are your numbers between runs?  I was trying to match
this up with your last email and things were pretty different.

> 
> In general, the patch reduces the amount of time direct reclaimers are
> spending on congestion_wait.
> 
> > It includes my patch from last night, along with changes to force dm to
> > unplug when its IO queues empty.
> > 
> > The problem goes like this:
> > 
> > Process: submit read bio
> > dm: put bio onto work queue
> > process: unplug
> > dm: work queue finds bio, does a generic_make_request
> > 
> > The end result is that we miss the unplug completely.  dm-crypt needs to
> > unplug for sync bios.  This patch also changes it to unplug whenever the
> > queue is empty, which is far from ideal but better than missing the
> > unplugs.
> > 
> > This doesn't completely fix io stalls I'm seeing with dm-crypt, but its
> > my best guess.  If it works, I'll break it up and submit for real to
> > the dm people.
> > 
> 
> Out of curiousity, how are you measuring IO stalls? In the tests I'm doing,
> the worker processes output their progress and it should be at a steady
> rate. I considered a stall to be an excessive delay between updates which
> is a pretty indirect measure.

I just setup a crypto disk and did dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/foo bs=1M

If you watch vmstat 1, there's supposed to be a constant steam of IO to
the disk.  If a whole second goes by with zero IO, we're doing something
wrong, I get a number of multi-second stalls where we are just waiting
for IO to happen.

Most of the time I was able to catch a sysrq-w for it, someone was
waiting on a read to finish.   It isn't completely clear to me if the
unplugging is working properly.

-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists