linux-kernel - Re: + recordmcount-stfu.patch added to -mm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:26:45 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc:	lihong.hi@...il.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: + recordmcount-stfu.patch added to -mm tree

On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 23:58:25 -0500 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:

> ...
>
> Andrew, would something like this patch be sufficient?
> 
> ...
>
> +	    "\tLocal function references are disabled.\n" .
> +	    "\tTo disable this message, create the file FTRACE_QUIET\n" .
> +	    "\tin the top level directory\n";

Dunno, really.  How many people are running old objdump, and do we want
to retard the rate at which the stragglers will upgrade?

I tend to be a late adopter ;) (for legit reasons, really - to catch
things like this) so I'd be OK carrying that patch locally.

Emitting that warning 1000000000000000000000000000 times per build is a
bit obnoxious.  Maybe find some way to restrict it to once per `make'?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/