linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] AT91 Kconfig rework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:01:22 +0000
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"'linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org'" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] AT91 Kconfig rework

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 04:30:51PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Hi Russell,
> 
> This is AT91 Kconfig rework for next merge window. After 
> discussing it on the mailing-list and Ack by Andrew Victor, I 
> send you this patchset. You can pull it from:
> 
>   git://github.com/at91linux/linux-2.6-at91.git for-rmk

FYI:

$ git pull git://github.com/at91linux/linux-2.6-at91.git for-rmk
remote: Counting objects: 41, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (28/28), done.
remote: Total 30 (delta 26), reused 2 (delta 2)
Unpacking objects: 100% (30/30), done.
>From git://github.com/at91linux/linux-2.6-at91
 * branch            for-rmk    -> FETCH_HEAD
Auto-merging arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
Recorded preimage for 'arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig'
Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.
$ git diff-files -u
diff --cc arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
index 2fd8843,3df124e..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
@@@ -320,7 -337,7 +337,11 @@@ config MACH_AT91SAM9G20E
  
  config MACH_AT91SAM9G20EK_2MMC
  	bool "Atmel AT91SAM9G20-EK Evaluation Kit with 2 SD/MMC Slots"
++<<<<<<< HEAD:arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
 +	depends on ARCH_AT91SAM9G20
++=======
+ 	select HAVE_NAND_ATMEL_BUSWIDTH_16
++>>>>>>> 0912e5359f89f303f53fd4874dadab77a4949a8a:arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
  	help
  	  Select this if you are using an Atmel AT91SAM9G20-EK Evaluation Kit
  	  with 2 SD/MMC Slots. This is the case for AT91SAM9G20-EK rev. C and
@@@ -394,7 -411,7 +415,11 @@@ config MTD_AT91_DATAFLASH_CAR
  
  config MTD_NAND_ATMEL_BUSWIDTH_16
  	bool "Enable 16-bit data bus interface to NAND flash"
++<<<<<<< HEAD:arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
 +	depends on (MACH_AT91SAM9260EK || MACH_AT91SAM9261EK || MACH_AT91SAM9G10EK || MACH_AT91SAM9263EK || MACH_AT91SAM9G20EK || MACH_AT91SAM9G20EK_2MMC || MACH_AT91SAM9G45EKES || MACH_AT91CAP9ADK)
++=======
+ 	depends on HAVE_NAND_ATMEL_BUSWIDTH_16
++>>>>>>> 0912e5359f89f303f53fd4874dadab77a4949a8a:arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
  	help
  	  On AT91SAM926x boards both types of NAND flash can be present
  	  (8 and 16 bit data bus width).

What's the resolution?  I think the first is just to include both, but
the second looks like the first depends needs deleting to leave only the
second?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/