linux-kernel - Re: [patch] x86: reduce srat verbosity in the kernel log

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:58:37 -0800
From:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@...glemail.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
	Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: reduce srat verbosity in the kernel log



Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
>> There's two problems outlined in this discussion:
>>
>>  A) too verbose bootup that is annoying with 64 CPUs and a show-stopper
>>     with 4096 CPUs.
>>
>>  B) the ad-hoc nature of our topology enumeration. Some of it is in
>>     /sys, some of it is in printk logs. None really works well and 
>>     there's no structure in it.
>>
>> The simplest solution for (A) is what i suggested a few mails ago: dont 
>> print the information by default, but allow (for trouble-shooting) 
>> purposes for it to be printed when a boot option is passed.
> 
> Well, yes, it is *simplest*, but is it best? Example printing 'cpus
> 0-31 stepping 3, cpus 32-63 stepping 4' seem rather convincing --such
> info should be there by default and not after speciial option...
> 									Pavel

I think that Ingo had a point.  If it's printing a summary after the
all the cpu's boot, then it should also be available online, which in
this case it's in /proc/cpuinfo.

Ingo - was there anything left open on my last submission that I have
to deal with, to gain acceptance?

Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/