lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:08:28 +0200
From:	Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@...ia.com>
To:	ext Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
Cc:	"Valentin Eduardo (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" <eduardo.valentin@...ia.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"De-Schrijver Peter (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" 
	<Peter.De-Schrijver@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] twl4030-regulator: Remove regulator from all
 groups when disabling

Hello Liam,

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 08:07:59PM +0100, ext Liam Girdwood wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 18:29 +0200, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > Just remove regulator from all groups when disabling. This way we
> > avoid problems if boot loader touches twl4030 registers.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@...ia.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/regulator/twl4030-regulator.c |    2 +-
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/regulator/twl4030-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/twl4030-regulator.c
> > index e2032fb..27b3115 100644
> > --- a/drivers/regulator/twl4030-regulator.c
> > +++ b/drivers/regulator/twl4030-regulator.c
> > @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static int twl4030reg_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> >  	if (grp < 0)
> >  		return grp;
> >  
> > -	grp &= ~P1_GRP;
> > +	grp &= ~(P1_GRP & P2_GRP | P3_GRP);
> >  	return twl4030reg_write(info, VREG_GRP, grp);
> >  }
> >  
> 
> Applied.

Thanks for applying. But this one has actually a typo
It was supposed to be:

+	grp &= ~(P1_GRP | P2_GRP | P3_GRP);

Could you please apply this one instead:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/11/20/231

?

> 
> Thanks
> 
> Liam
> 


BR,

-- 
Eduardo Valentin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ