linux-kernel - Re: [patch 0/8] x86: UV - XPC fixes with related support functionality V2.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:57:51 -0600
From:	Robin Holt <holt@....com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
	Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/8] x86: UV - XPC fixes with related support
	functionality V2.

> Regarding the patches - i still very much dislike how the code 
> interfaces to the 'BIOS'. The drivers/misc/sgi-xp/ code looks rather 
> messy.
> 
> Why isnt a pure hardware interface exposed, as both hpa and me suggested 
> in the past?

The information is stored on hardware (UV-Hub and RAM) outside this instance of hardware.

The only safe way to access that hardware is via the GRU.

No GRU resources are available to the BIOS.

Ergo, this interface method with multiple passes is needed.

If there is a better way, I am open to suggestions.

> Anyway ... these bits got merged via -mm in the past so i guess it could 
> be done there in the future too - the series does not look horrible - 
> but the whole concept ought to be done in a cleaner way.

I will ask Andrew to take them.

Thanks,
Robin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/