linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: workqueues tree build failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:44:31 +0200
From:	Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ia.com>
To:	ext Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	ext Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: workqueues tree build failure

On Thursday 26 November 2009 12:18:59 ext Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 11:31:15AM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > For a quick fix, I can convert the tlv320dac33 driver to use this, and
> > revisit later, if it does not fulfill the timing requirements for the HW.
> 
> If there are problems then creating a dedicated thread you can wake
> would probably do the job.

For now I'm going to change the create_rt_workqueue to 
create_singlethread_workqueue, that is available at the wq.git of kernel.org.

If it is not sufficient, than I might use dedicated thread, which I woke up, but 
I would like to keep that as a backup plan, since it needs more work ;)

I'll send the patch in a few minutes.

-- 
Péter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/