linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 36/86] pata_it8213: add UDMA100 and UDMA133 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:36:28 +0100
From:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
To:	Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
Cc:	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 36/86] pata_it8213: add UDMA100 and UDMA133 support

On Thursday 26 November 2009 04:17:51 pm Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello, I wrote:
> 
> >> There shouldn't be any problems with it as IDE it8213 host driver
> >> has been supporting UDMA100 and UDMA133 for years.
> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
> 
> >> Index: b/drivers/ata/pata_it8213.c
> >> ===================================================================
> >> --- a/drivers/ata/pata_it8213.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_it8213.c
> >> @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static void it8213_set_dmamode (struct a
> >>  
> >>          /* Clocks follow the PIIX style */
> >>          u_speed = min(2 - (udma & 1), udma);
> >> -        if (udma == 5)
> >> +        if (udma > 4)
> >>              u_clock = 0x1000;    /* 100Mhz */
> >>          else if (udma > 2)
> >>              u_clock = 1;        /* 66Mhz */
> >> @@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ static int it8213_init_one (struct pci_d
> >>          .flags        = ATA_FLAG_SLAVE_POSS,
> >>          .pio_mask    = ATA_PIO4,
> >>          .mwdma_mask    = ATA_MWDMA2,
> >> -        .udma_mask     = ATA_UDMA4, /* FIXME: want UDMA 100? */
> >> +        .udma_mask     = ATA_UDMA6,
> >>          .port_ops    = &it8213_ops,
> >>      };
> >>      /* Current IT8213 stuff is single port */
> 
> >    Well, at 100 MHz it's probably not really UDMA6 but UDMA5 in 
> > disguise... though u_speed would be 2 instead of 1 which should 
> > correspond to either 3 clocks or 1 clock according to Intel's 
> > documentation (different Intel docs give different figures and even ICH 
> > PRM gives *both* clocks).
> 
>     If we take 3 clocks as correct (1 clock doesn't seem correct anyways, as 
> with UDMA mode 5 UDMA cycle must be 20 ns and 1 clock gives only 10 ns). 
> Well, then UDMA5 doesn't seem different from UDMA4 with ICH controllers and 
> it's not clear why all the fuss about 100 MHz bit was necessary... :-/

Sergei, please remember that IT8213 is a _custom_ spin-off from ICH chipset
and it gets some things in rather radically different way (i.e. value of PPE
bit is reversed on IT8213).

>     Returning to IT8213, with UDMA6 we have 'u_speed' of 2 that should 
> correspond to 2 clocks which is 20 ns at 100 MHz and really is an UDMA5 
> speed. Well, given UDMA5's slowness, that's definitely a gain. The question 
> remains however, isn't this value reserved like on original ICH?

It is not according to the official documentation for IT8213 (+ the chip
officially claims to support UDMA6) and pata_it8213 behavior now matches
the behavior of it8213 host driver.

I would love to be able to explain IT8213 chip internals in more detail
but unfortunately the documentation is rather cryptic in this regard as
it only gives you specific values that you should program into specific
registers to get chip properly configured for specific transfer modes...

--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/