linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pci: fix bridge 64bit flag setting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 1 Dec 2009 08:38:55 -0700
From:	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...com>,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Grant Grundler <grundler@...isc-linux.org>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
	Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: fix bridge 64bit flag setting

On Tuesday 01 December 2009 12:03:57 am Yinghai Lu wrote:
> 
> Alex found one system that one pci bridge pref mmio 64 is not set correctly.
> aka, the upper32 base/limit is not cleaned.
> he found that bridge is supporting 64 bit pref mmio, but device under that
> does not support that. so that IORESOURCE_MEM_64 get cleared in pbus_size_mem()

I think it's wrong that pbus_size_mem() fiddles with IORESOURCE_MEM_64
in bus resources based on where BARs of devices on that bus live.  That
feels fragile.

The question of whether the bridge supports 64-bit apertures is
strictly a hardware property of the bridge.  It has nothing to do
with where we place downstream devices.

Is there really a problem with writing to PCI_PREF_BASE_UPPER32
unconditionally?  As Alex pointed out, per 3.2.5.10 of the bridge
spec, the UPPER32 registers are read-only if only 32-bit apertures
are supported.  If you mentioned a problem with doing this
unconditionally, I missed it.

The only place we test IORESOURCE_MEM_64 for a bus resource is when
we're programming PCI_PREF_BASE_UPPER32.  If we think it's important
to program it conditionally, why don't we skip IORESOURCE_MEM_64
altogether, and just look at the bits in PCI_PREF_MEMORY_BASE directly?
E.g., something like this:

	pci_read_config_dword(bridge, PCI_PREF_MEMORY_BASE, &l);
	if ((l & PCI_PREF_RANGE_TYPE_MASK) == PCI_PREF_RANGE_TYPE_64) {
		pci_write_config_dword(bridge, PCI_PREF_BASE_UPPER32, bu);
		pci_write_config_dword(bridge, PCI_PREF_LIMIT_UPPER32, lu);
	}

Then we don't have to maintain flags at all, and it's easy to verify
that the code corresponds to the spec.

Bjorn

> the fix will be:
> make pci_bridge_check_ranges() to store the PCI_PREF_RANGE_TYPE_64 in addition
> to IORESOURCE_MEM_64. just like pci_read_bridge_bases()
> and later will use that bit in  pci_setup_bridge_mmio_pref instead of
> IORESOURCE_MEM_64.
> also avoid touching upper32 regs if the bridge does not support 64bit pref.
> 
> Reported-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> 
> ---
>  drivers/pci/setup-bus.c |    9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> @@ -289,7 +289,6 @@ static void pci_setup_bridge_mmio_pref(s
>  	struct resource *res;
>  	struct pci_bus_region region;
>  	u32 l, bu, lu;
> -	int pref_mem64;
>  
>  	/* Clear out the upper 32 bits of PREF limit.
>  	   If PCI_PREF_BASE_UPPER32 was non-zero, this temporarily
> @@ -297,7 +296,6 @@ static void pci_setup_bridge_mmio_pref(s
>  	pci_write_config_dword(bridge, PCI_PREF_LIMIT_UPPER32, 0);
>  
>  	/* Set up PREF base/limit. */
> -	pref_mem64 = 0;
>  	bu = lu = 0;
>  	res = bus->resource[2];
>  	pcibios_resource_to_bus(bridge, &region, res);
> @@ -305,7 +303,6 @@ static void pci_setup_bridge_mmio_pref(s
>  		l = (region.start >> 16) & 0xfff0;
>  		l |= region.end & 0xfff00000;
>  		if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM_64) {
> -			pref_mem64 = 1;
>  			bu = upper_32_bits(region.start);
>  			lu = upper_32_bits(region.end);
>  		}
> @@ -317,7 +314,7 @@ static void pci_setup_bridge_mmio_pref(s
>  	}
>  	pci_write_config_dword(bridge, PCI_PREF_MEMORY_BASE, l);
>  
> -	if (pref_mem64) {
> +	if (res->flags & PCI_PREF_RANGE_TYPE_64) {
>  		/* Set the upper 32 bits of PREF base & limit. */
>  		pci_write_config_dword(bridge, PCI_PREF_BASE_UPPER32, bu);
>  		pci_write_config_dword(bridge, PCI_PREF_LIMIT_UPPER32, lu);
> @@ -385,8 +382,10 @@ static void pci_bridge_check_ranges(stru
>  	}
>  	if (pmem) {
>  		b_res[2].flags |= IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_PREFETCH;
> -		if ((pmem & PCI_PREF_RANGE_TYPE_MASK) == PCI_PREF_RANGE_TYPE_64)
> +		if ((pmem & PCI_PREF_RANGE_TYPE_MASK) == PCI_PREF_RANGE_TYPE_64) {
>  			b_res[2].flags |= IORESOURCE_MEM_64;
> +			b_res[2].flags |= PCI_PREF_RANGE_TYPE_64;
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	/* double check if bridge does support 64 bit pref */
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/