linux-kernel - Re: Signal from kernel space to user space

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:05:56 -0800 (PST)
From:	Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To:	Mark Hounschell <markh@...pro.net>
cc:	Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>,
	Mai Daftedar <mai.daftedar@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Signal from kernel space to user space

On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Mark Hounschell wrote:

> If no "information" is required, which of these are the fastest, say from an interrupt handler?
> I have a PCI card that handles external interrupts from the outside world and does nothing but
> report those external interrupts to userland. We use send_sig or wake_up_process depending
> on whether userland is going to wait for it or not. If there is a better/faster way I would be
> very interested.

eventfd is. eventfd_signal() is also callable from non-sleeping contexts.


- Davide


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/