lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 3 Dec 2009 16:44:02 -0600
From:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
To:	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jmorris@...ei.org,
	npiggin@...e.de, zohar@...ibm.com, jack@...e.cz,
	jmalicki@...acarta.com, dsmith@...hat.com, hch@....de,
	john@...nmccutchan.com, rlove@...ve.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp,
	mszeredi@...e.cz, jens.axboe@...cle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	matthew@....cx, hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp,
	davem@...emloft.net, arnd@...db.de, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] vfs: make init-file static

Quoting Eric Paris (eparis@...hat.com):
> init-file is no longer used by anything except alloc_file.  Make it static and
> remove from headers.

Should these go through a deprecation period?  (Same for the next patch)

> Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
> ---
> 
>  fs/file_table.c      |   73 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
>  include/linux/file.h |    3 --
>  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/file_table.c b/fs/file_table.c
> index 4bef4c0..0f9d2f2 100644
> --- a/fs/file_table.c
> +++ b/fs/file_table.c
> @@ -150,53 +150,16 @@ fail:
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_empty_filp);
> 
>  /**
> - * alloc_file - allocate and initialize a 'struct file'
> - * @mnt: the vfsmount on which the file will reside
> - * @dentry: the dentry representing the new file
> - * @mode: the mode with which the new file will be opened
> - * @fop: the 'struct file_operations' for the new file
> - *
> - * Use this instead of get_empty_filp() to get a new
> - * 'struct file'.  Do so because of the same initialization
> - * pitfalls reasons listed for init_file().  This is a
> - * preferred interface to using init_file().
> - *
> - * If all the callers of init_file() are eliminated, its
> - * code should be moved into this function.
> - */
> -struct file *alloc_file(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct dentry *dentry,
> -		fmode_t mode, const struct file_operations *fop)
> -{
> -	struct file *file;
> -
> -	file = get_empty_filp();
> -	if (!file)
> -		return NULL;
> -
> -	init_file(file, mnt, dentry, mode, fop);
> -	return file;
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(alloc_file);
> -
> -/**
>   * init_file - initialize a 'struct file'
>   * @file: the already allocated 'struct file' to initialized
>   * @mnt: the vfsmount on which the file resides
>   * @dentry: the dentry representing this file
>   * @mode: the mode the file is opened with
>   * @fop: the 'struct file_operations' for this file
> - *
> - * Use this instead of setting the members directly.  Doing so
> - * avoids making mistakes like forgetting the mntget() or
> - * forgetting to take a write on the mnt.
> - *
> - * Note: This is a crappy interface.  It is here to make
> - * merging with the existing users of get_empty_filp()
> - * who have complex failure logic easier.  All users
> - * of this should be moving to alloc_file().
>   */
> -int init_file(struct file *file, struct vfsmount *mnt, struct dentry *dentry,
> -	   fmode_t mode, const struct file_operations *fop)
> +static int init_file(struct file *file, struct vfsmount *mnt,
> +		     struct dentry *dentry, fmode_t mode,
> +		     const struct file_operations *fop)
>  {
>  	int error = 0;
>  	file->f_path.dentry = dentry;
> @@ -218,7 +181,35 @@ int init_file(struct file *file, struct vfsmount *mnt, struct dentry *dentry,
>  	}
>  	return error;
>  }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(init_file);
> +
> +/**
> + * alloc_file - allocate and initialize a 'struct file'
> + * @mnt: the vfsmount on which the file will reside
> + * @dentry: the dentry representing the new file
> + * @mode: the mode with which the new file will be opened
> + * @fop: the 'struct file_operations' for the new file
> + *
> + * Use this instead of get_empty_filp() to get a new
> + * 'struct file'.  Do so because of the same initialization
> + * pitfalls reasons listed for init_file().  This is a
> + * preferred interface to using init_file().
> + *
> + * If all the callers of init_file() are eliminated, its
> + * code should be moved into this function.
> + */
> +struct file *alloc_file(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct dentry *dentry,
> +		fmode_t mode, const struct file_operations *fop)
> +{
> +	struct file *file;
> +
> +	file = get_empty_filp();
> +	if (!file)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	init_file(file, mnt, dentry, mode, fop);
> +	return file;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(alloc_file);
> 
>  void fput(struct file *file)
>  {
> diff --git a/include/linux/file.h b/include/linux/file.h
> index 335a0a5..6a8d361 100644
> --- a/include/linux/file.h
> +++ b/include/linux/file.h
> @@ -18,9 +18,6 @@ extern void drop_file_write_access(struct file *file);
>  struct file_operations;
>  struct vfsmount;
>  struct dentry;
> -extern int init_file(struct file *, struct vfsmount *mnt,
> -		struct dentry *dentry, fmode_t mode,
> -		const struct file_operations *fop);
>  extern struct file *alloc_file(struct vfsmount *, struct dentry *dentry,
>  		fmode_t mode, const struct file_operations *fop);
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ