linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] PM updates for 2.6.33

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 6 Dec 2009 09:39:41 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] PM updates for 2.6.33


* Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 02:26:06 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> 
> > On Sunday 06 December 2009, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 00:55:36 +0100
> > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Disk spinup/spindown takes time, but also some ACPI devices resume
> > > > slowly, serio devices do that too and there are surprisingly many
> > > > drivers that wait (using msleep() during suspend and resume).
> > > > Apart from this, every PCI device going from D0 to D3 during
> > > > suspend and from D3 to D0 during resume requires us to sleep for
> > > > 10 ms (the sleeping is done by the PCI core, so the drivers don't
> > > > even realize its there).
> > > 
> > > maybe a good step is to make a scripts/bootgraph.pl equivalent for
> > > suspend/resume (or make a debug mode that outputs in a compatible
> > > format so that the script can be used as is.. I don't mind either
> > > way, and consider this my offer to help with such a script as long
> > > as there's sufficient logging in dmesg ;-)
> > 
> > OK, so what kind of logging is needed?
> 
> basically the equivalent of the two initcall_debug paths in
> 
> init/main.c:do_one_initcall()
> 
> which prints a start time and an end time (and a pid) for each init 
> function; if we have the same for suspend calls (and resume)... we can 
> make the tool graph it.
>
> Would be nice to get markers for start and end of the whole suspend 
> sequence as well as for the resume sequence; those make it easier to 
> know when the end is (so that the axis can be drawn etc)
> 
> shouldn't be too hard to implement...

I think an even better option would be to extend 'perf timechart' to be 
suspend/resume aware: add a few tracepoint events and teach 'perf 
timechart' to draw them. (We should be able to do perf timechart record 
across suspend/resume cycles just fine.)

( Doing that would also improve the tracing facilities within 
  suspend/resume quite significantly. It wouldnt just be a 
  single-purpose thing for graphing, but perf trace and perf stat would 
  work equally well. )

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/