linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Does raw_field_ptr() supports __data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 07 Dec 2009 11:09:18 -0500
From:	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
To:	Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Does raw_field_ptr() supports __data_loc?

On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 12:34 +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> VERY very sorry for my long silence...
> 
> Please don't commit this patch, Ingo.
> This patch is required to test the next patch for perf lock.
> 
> I have a question for Steven Rostedt and Tom Zanussi.
> Does current raw_field_ptr() support __data_loc?
> 
> At 064739bc4b3d7f424b2f25547e6611bcf0132415 ,
> support for the modifier "__data_loc" of format is added.
> 
> But, when I wanted to parse format of lock_acquired (or some event else),
> raw_field_ptr() did not returned correct pointer.
> 
> So I modified raw_field_ptr() like this patch. Then raw_field_ptr() works well.
> Parser was large so I'd like to ask you about this.
> 
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
> Cc: Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
> 
> I have a question
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/trace-event-parse.c |    7 +++++++
>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/trace-event-parse.c b/tools/perf/util/trace-event-parse.c
> index 0302405..494a470 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/trace-event-parse.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/trace-event-parse.c
> @@ -1925,6 +1925,13 @@ void *raw_field_ptr(struct event *event, const char *name, void *data)
>  	if (!field)
>  		return NULL;
>  
> +	if (field->flags & FIELD_IS_STRING) {
> +		int offset;
> +		offset = *(int *)(data + field->offset);
> +		offset &= 0xffff;
> +		return data + offset;
> +	}
> +

Hmm, I guess I need to update the code in perf again. The way I did this
was to have FIELD_IS_STRING evaluated in the eval_num_arg.


-- Steve

>  	return data + field->offset;
>  }
>  

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/