| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 18:25:15 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: linux-next: percpu/tip tree build failure
Hi all,
Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:86: error: 'task_bp_pinned' redeclared as different kind of symbol
kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:55: note: previous declaration of 'task_bp_pinned' was here
kernel/hw_breakpoint.c: In function 'toggle_bp_task_slot':
kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:165: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type
Caused by commit dd17c8f72993f9461e9c19250e3f155d6d99df22 ("percpu:
remove per_cpu__ prefix") from the percpu tree interacting with commit
56053170ea2a2c0dc17420e9b94aa3ca51d80408 ("hw-breakpoints: Fix task-bound
breakpoint slot allocation") from the tip tree.
I have applied the following patch for today (and can carry it as
necessary:
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 18:19:48 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] percpu: make per_cpu variable name unique in hw_breakpoint.c
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
---
kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
index 02b4925..03a0773 100644
--- a/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, nr_cpu_bp_pinned);
/* Number of pinned task breakpoints in a cpu */
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, task_bp_pinned[HBP_NUM]);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, nr_task_bp_pinned[HBP_NUM]);
/* Number of non-pinned cpu/task breakpoints in a cpu */
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, nr_bp_flexible);
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(nr_bp_mutex);
static unsigned int max_task_bp_pinned(int cpu)
{
int i;
- unsigned int *tsk_pinned = per_cpu(task_bp_pinned, cpu);
+ unsigned int *tsk_pinned = per_cpu(nr_task_bp_pinned, cpu);
for (i = HBP_NUM -1; i >= 0; i--) {
if (tsk_pinned[i] > 0)
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static void toggle_bp_task_slot(struct task_struct *tsk, int cpu, bool enable)
count = task_bp_pinned(tsk);
- tsk_pinned = per_cpu(task_bp_pinned, cpu);
+ tsk_pinned = per_cpu(nr_task_bp_pinned, cpu);
if (enable) {
tsk_pinned[count]++;
if (count > 0)
@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ static void toggle_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, bool enable)
* - If attached to a single cpu, check:
*
* (per_cpu(nr_bp_flexible, cpu) || (per_cpu(nr_cpu_bp_pinned, cpu)
- * + max(per_cpu(task_bp_pinned, cpu)))) < HBP_NUM
+ * + max(per_cpu(nr_task_bp_pinned, cpu)))) < HBP_NUM
*
* -> If there are already non-pinned counters in this cpu, it means
* there is already a free slot for them.
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static void toggle_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, bool enable)
* - If attached to every cpus, check:
*
* (per_cpu(nr_bp_flexible, *) || (max(per_cpu(nr_cpu_bp_pinned, *))
- * + max(per_cpu(task_bp_pinned, *)))) < HBP_NUM
+ * + max(per_cpu(nr_task_bp_pinned, *)))) < HBP_NUM
*
* -> This is roughly the same, except we check the number of per cpu
* bp for every cpu and we keep the max one. Same for the per tasks
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static void toggle_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, bool enable)
* - If attached to a single cpu, check:
*
* ((per_cpu(nr_bp_flexible, cpu) > 1) + per_cpu(nr_cpu_bp_pinned, cpu)
- * + max(per_cpu(task_bp_pinned, cpu))) < HBP_NUM
+ * + max(per_cpu(nr_task_bp_pinned, cpu))) < HBP_NUM
*
* -> Same checks as before. But now the nr_bp_flexible, if any, must keep
* one register at least (or they will never be fed).
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static void toggle_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, bool enable)
* - If attached to every cpus, check:
*
* ((per_cpu(nr_bp_flexible, *) > 1) + max(per_cpu(nr_cpu_bp_pinned, *))
- * + max(per_cpu(task_bp_pinned, *))) < HBP_NUM
+ * + max(per_cpu(nr_task_bp_pinned, *))) < HBP_NUM
*/
int reserve_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp)
{
--
1.6.5.3
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists