linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/13] tracing: Extract calls to trace_define_common

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:21:14 +0800
From:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] tracing: Extract calls to	trace_define_common_fields()

>>>>> @@ -1131,10 +1127,6 @@ static int kretprobe_event_define_fields(struct ftrace_event_call *event_call)
>>>>>  	struct kretprobe_trace_entry field;
>>>>>  	struct trace_probe *tp = (struct trace_probe *)event_call->data;
>>>>>  
>>>>> -	ret = trace_define_common_fields(event_call);
>>>>> -	if (!ret)
>>>>> -		return ret;
>>>>> -
>>>>>  	DEFINE_FIELD(unsigned long, func, FIELD_STRING_FUNC, 0);
>>>>>  	DEFINE_FIELD(unsigned long, ret_ip, FIELD_STRING_RETIP, 0);
>>>>>  	DEFINE_FIELD(int, nargs, FIELD_STRING_NARGS, 1);
>>>> "if (!ret)" is wrong. trace_define_common_fields() returns zero when success.
>>>> So "unsigned long, func", "unsigned long, ret_ip" ...etc are NOT "defined"
>>>> and filters can not be applied for trace_kprobe.
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
>>>>
>>> Oh right!
>>>
>>> Ok, I'm queueing this one for the tracing fixes.
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>> This patch has dependency on the previous patch..So can you queue
>> all other patches and send a pull request to Ingo? We're still
>> in the early merge window, so those patches should be fine for
>> .33.
>>
>> And as this patch fixes a bug "acidentally", the changelog
>> needs a bit revision.
> 
> The problem is that we can't know in advance Linus will take
> a second round of tracing features in this merge window.
> 
> I'd rather be careful and keep separating tracing fixes and
> tracing features.
> 
> I'm preparing a separate fix.
> 

But there is no functionality change or new feature in this
patchset, all are cleanups and fixes.

That said, I don't mind how you separate them. :)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/