lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 16:42:21 -0800 From: Andy Isaacson <adi@...apodia.org> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: Richard Zidlicky <rz@...ux-m68k.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.32 regression, hard lock On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 02:30:57PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > btw, why does your kernel say "To Be Filled By O.E.M." in the traces? > The kernel.org kernel doesn't do that. Is that kernel patched at all? That's traditional for DMI_PRODUCT_NAME in dodgy vendor BIOSes. I routinely see it on Intel evaluation boards and less frequently on Taiwanese Brand X boards. -andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists