linux-kernel - Re: [patch 2/2] sched: Protect sched_rr_get_param access to task->sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 9 Dec 2009 09:06:42 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] sched: Protect sched_rr_get_param access to
 task->sched_class

On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 09:00 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 20:24 +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > plain text document attachment
> > > (sched-fix-sched-get-rr-param-race.patch)
> > > sched_rr_get_param calls task->sched_class->get_rr_interval(task)
> > > without protection against a concurrent sched_setscheduler() call
> > > which modifies task->sched_class.
> > > 
> > > Serialize the access with task_rq_lock(task);
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > > ---
> > >  kernel/sched.c |    4 ++++
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > Index: linux-2.6-tip/kernel/sched.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-2.6-tip.orig/kernel/sched.c
> > > +++ linux-2.6-tip/kernel/sched.c
> > > @@ -6887,6 +6887,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(sched_rr_get_interval, p
> > >  {
> > >  	struct task_struct *p;
> > >  	unsigned int time_slice;
> > > +	unsigned long flags;
> > > +	struct rq *rq;
> > >  	int retval;
> > >  	struct timespec t;
> > >  
> > > @@ -6903,7 +6905,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(sched_rr_get_interval, p
> > >  	if (retval)
> > >  		goto out_unlock;
> > >  
> > > +	rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
> > >  	time_slice = p->sched_class->get_rr_interval(p);
> > > +	task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags);
> > >  
> > >  	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> > >  	jiffies_to_timespec(time_slice, &t);
> > > 
> > 
> > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> 
> Oh, that was too quick, get_rr_interval_fair() actually takes the
> rq->lock, so lets add this:
> 
>  unsigned int get_rr_interval_fair(struct task_struct *task)
>  {
>         struct sched_entity *se = &task->se;
> -       unsigned long flags;
> -       struct rq *rq;
>         unsigned int rr_interval = 0;
> 
>         /*
>          * Time slice is 0 for SCHED_OTHER tasks that are on an otherwise
>          * idle runqueue:
>          */
> -       rq = task_rq_lock(task, &flags);
>         if (rq->cfs.load.weight)
>                 rr_interval = NS_TO_JIFFIES(sched_slice(&rq->cfs, se));
> -       task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags);
> -
>         return rr_interval;
>  }

Duh, yes. I looked at that actually and made a mental note to remove it. :(

Thanks for catching that,

       tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/