linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 28/31] Constify struct super

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 9 Dec 2009 01:31:10 +0000
From:	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
To:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc:	re.emese@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 28/31] Constify struct super_operations for 2.6.32 v1

On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 08:14:46AM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:

> Subject: Re: [PATCH 28/31] Constify struct super_operations for 2.6.32 v1
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> > -   	struct inode *(*alloc_inode)(struct super_block *sb);
> > +   	struct inode *(* const alloc_inode)(struct super_block *sb);
> 
> Good rule is if adding const doesn't move object from one section
> to another, it isn't worth it.

On MIPS I've changed a few pointer arguments that frequently were abused
by platform-specific code to const just to make sure such code blows up
at compile time and not later in my mail folder at review time.

  Ralf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/