lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:35:15 -0600
From:	Adam Litke <agl@...ibm.com>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:	Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] virtio: Fix scheduling while atomic in virtio_balloon stats

[PATCH] virtio: Fix scheduling while atomic in virtio_balloon stats

This is a fix for my earlier patch: "virtio: Add memory statistics reporting to
the balloon driver (V4)".

I discovered that all_vm_events() can sleep and therefore stats collection
cannot be done in interrupt context.  One solution is to handle the interrupt
by noting that stats need to be collected and waking the existing vballoon
kthread which will complete the work via stats_handle_request().  Rusty, is
this a saner way of doing business?

There is one issue that I would like a broader opinion on.  In stats_request, I
update vb->need_stats_update and then wake up the kthread.  The kthread uses
vb->need_stats_update as a condition variable.  Do I need a memory barrier
between the update and wake_up to ensure that my kthread sees the correct
value?  My testing suggests that it is not needed but I would like some
confirmation from the experts.

Signed-off-by: Adam Litke <agl@...ibm.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org

diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
index b45d946..c4a6437 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct virtio_balloon
 	u32 pfns[256];
 
 	/* Memory statistics */
+	int need_stats_update;
 	struct virtio_balloon_stat stats[VIRTIO_BALLOON_S_NR];
 };
 
@@ -194,20 +195,30 @@ static void update_balloon_stats(struct virtio_balloon *vb)
  * the stats queue operates in reverse.  The driver initializes the virtqueue
  * with a single buffer.  From that point forward, all conversations consist of
  * a hypervisor request (a call to this function) which directs us to refill
- * the virtqueue with a fresh stats buffer.
+ * the virtqueue with a fresh stats buffer.  Since stats collection can sleep,
+ * we notify our kthread which does the actual work via stats_handle_request().
  */
-static void stats_ack(struct virtqueue *vq)
+static void stats_request(struct virtqueue *vq)
 {
 	struct virtio_balloon *vb;
 	unsigned int len;
-	struct scatterlist sg;
 
 	vb = vq->vq_ops->get_buf(vq, &len);
 	if (!vb)
 		return;
+	vb->need_stats_update = 1;
+	wake_up(&vb->config_change);
+}
+
+static void stats_handle_request(struct virtio_balloon *vb)
+{
+	struct virtqueue *vq;
+	struct scatterlist sg;
 
+	vb->need_stats_update = 0;
 	update_balloon_stats(vb);
 
+	vq = vb->stats_vq;
 	sg_init_one(&sg, vb->stats, sizeof(vb->stats));
 	if (vq->vq_ops->add_buf(vq, &sg, 1, 0, vb) < 0)
 		BUG();
@@ -250,8 +261,11 @@ static int balloon(void *_vballoon)
 		try_to_freeze();
 		wait_event_interruptible(vb->config_change,
 					 (diff = towards_target(vb)) != 0
+					 || vb->need_stats_update
 					 || kthread_should_stop()
 					 || freezing(current));
+		if (vb->need_stats_update)
+			stats_handle_request(vb);
 		if (diff > 0)
 			fill_balloon(vb, diff);
 		else if (diff < 0)
@@ -265,7 +279,7 @@ static int virtballoon_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 {
 	struct virtio_balloon *vb;
 	struct virtqueue *vqs[3];
-	vq_callback_t *callbacks[] = { balloon_ack, balloon_ack, stats_ack };
+	vq_callback_t *callbacks[] = { balloon_ack, balloon_ack, stats_request };
 	const char *names[] = { "inflate", "deflate", "stats" };
 	int err, nvqs;
 


-- 
Thanks,
Adam

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ