linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] drm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:32:56 -0800 (PST)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"C. Bergström" <cbergstrom@...hscale.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.sf.net
Subject: Re: [git pull] drm

On Thu, 10 Dec 2009, "C. Bergström" wrote:
>   
> Thanks for the rather lengthly explanation, but in case you missed what people
> are trying to say here..
> 
> With all due respect Linus..
> 
> "patches welcome"

The problem is that I have never even heard a Red Hat or Fedora person 
actually acknoledge that yes, they should be trying to upstream it.

Have Red Hat and Fedora just decided that "upstream first" simply doesn't 
matter any more? Because quite frankly, that was kind of the feeling I 
came away with from the Kernel summit.

It's like they _want_ to keep it internal.

			Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/