lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:16:53 +0000
From:	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko@...ulin.net>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...hos.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Are these MTRR settings correct?

On Monday 14 Dec 2009 19:47:40 Yinghai Lu wrote:
> Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > On Monday 14 Dec 2009 11:25:58 Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >>>> something wrong, we should not check that with e820 or acpi resource
> >>>> in that case. please check
> >>>>
> >>>> {PATCH] x86/pci: don't check mmconf again if it is from MSR with amd
> >>>> faml0h
> >>>>
> >>>> for AMD Fam10h, it we read mmconf from MSR early, we should just trust
> >>>> it because we check it and correct it already.
> >>>>
> >>>> so skip the reject check there.
> >>>
> >>> [path snipped]
> >>>
> >>> Do you want me to test with this patch and that pci=.. option active
> >>> and post dmesg? Or without the pci=... option?
> >>
> >> with this patch and pci=... and post dmesg...
> >
> > Here you go:
> 
> ...
> 
> > [    0.250041] node 0 link 0: io port [1000, ffffff]
> > [    0.250043] TOM: 00000000e0000000 aka 3584M
> > [    0.250044] Fam 10h mmconf [e0000000, efffffff]
> > [    0.250046] node 0 link 0: mmio [a0000, bffff]
> > [    0.250048] node 0 link 0: mmio [e0000000, efffffff] ==> none
> > [    0.250050] node 0 link 0: mmio [f0000000, fe7fffff]
> > [    0.250051] node 0 link 0: mmio [fe800000, fe9fffff]
> > [    0.250053] node 0 link 0: mmio [fea00000, ffefffff]
> > [    0.250054] TOM2: 0000000120000000 aka 4608M
> > [    0.250056] bus: [00,07] on node 0 link 0
> > [    0.250057] bus: 00 index 0 io port: [0, ffff]
> > [    0.250058] bus: 00 index 1 mmio: [a0000, bffff]
> > [    0.250060] bus: 00 index 2 mmio: [f0000000, ffffffff]
> > [    0.250061] bus: 00 index 3 mmio: [120000000, fcffffffff]
> > [    0.250068] ACPI: bus type pci registered
> > [    0.250091] PCI: Found AMD Family 10h NB with MMCONFIG support.
> > [    0.254793] PCI: Using MMCONFIG at e0000000 - efffffff
> > [    0.254795] PCI: Using configuration type 1 for base access
> 
> ...
> 
> thanks, mmconf works on your system.

So I should keep using both your patch and pci=check_enable_amd_mmconf option?

Tvrtko


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ