linux-kernel - Re: tree with htc dream support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:34:48 -0800
From:	Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>,
	Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Iliyan Malchev <malchev@...gle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: tree with htc dream support

On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> >> > Arve's about to take our common and msm trees and rebase them over the .32,
>> >> > which may be useful for reference -- at least as a snapshot of a fully
>> >> > functional set of patches that android donut and eclair run on, on
>> >> > production hardware.  We'll make that available as soon as we have something
>> >> > that's bootable.
>> >> >
>> >> > Brian
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> A first pass of this is available in the android-msm-2.6.32-test1
>> >> branch at git://android.git.kernel.org/kernel/experimental.git.
>> >>
>> >> http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=kernel/experimental.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/android-msm-2.6.32-test1
>> >
>> > Does this have the the newest wakelock code in it? From the all the
>> > re-writes that you've done.
>>
>> No.
>
> One more wish list item: many drivers are now available in
> drivers/staging/dream, and are being slowly cleaned up. Would it be
> possible to start using those for android-msm-2.6.32 tree?
>
> You'll need to reapply some stuff I had to remove (like wakelocks),
> but it should be still better/less work long term to patch those back
> in than maintaining separate copy. Diff should get much smaller...
>                                                                        Pavel

I do plan to look at these, but I don't know when I'll get to it.

-- 
Arve Hjønnevåg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/