linux-kernel - [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 15/18] rcu: give different levels of the rcu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:02:38 -0800
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
	josh@...htriplett.org, dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, dhowells@...hat.com,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 15/18] rcu: give different levels of the rcu_node hierarchy distinct lockdep names

From: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

Proposed for 2.6.34, not for inclusion.

Previously, each level of the rcu_node hierarchy had the same rather
unimaginative name: "&rcu_node_class[i]".  This makes lockdep diagnostics
involving these lockdep classes less helpful than would be nice.  This
patch fixes this by giving each level of the rcu_node hierarchy a distinct
name: "rcu_node_level_0", "rcu_node_level_1", and so on.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcutree.c |    9 ++++++++-
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 0a4c328..a6e45f6 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -1811,11 +1811,17 @@ static void __init rcu_init_levelspread(struct rcu_state *rsp)
  */
 static void __init rcu_init_one(struct rcu_state *rsp)
 {
+	static char *buf[] = { "rcu_node_level_0",
+			       "rcu_node_level_1",
+			       "rcu_node_level_2",
+			       "rcu_node_level_3" };  /* Match MAX_RCU_LVLS */
 	int cpustride = 1;
 	int i;
 	int j;
 	struct rcu_node *rnp;
 
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(MAX_RCU_LVLS > 4);  /* Fix buf[] initialization! */
+
 	/* Initialize the level-tracking arrays. */
 
 	for (i = 1; i < NUM_RCU_LVLS; i++)
@@ -1829,7 +1835,8 @@ static void __init rcu_init_one(struct rcu_state *rsp)
 		rnp = rsp->level[i];
 		for (j = 0; j < rsp->levelcnt[i]; j++, rnp++) {
 			spin_lock_init(&rnp->lock);
-			lockdep_set_class(&rnp->lock, &rcu_node_class[i]);
+			lockdep_set_class_and_name(&rnp->lock,
+						   &rcu_node_class[i], buf[i]);
 			rnp->gpnum = 0;
 			rnp->qsmask = 0;
 			rnp->qsmaskinit = 0;
-- 
1.5.2.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/