| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:24:11 +0530 From: Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ibm.com> To: Xiaotian Feng <xtfeng@...il.com> CC: Linux/PPC Development <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> Subject: Re: [Next] CPU Hotplug test failures on powerpc Xiaotian Feng wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ibm.com> wrote: > >> Xiaotian Feng wrote: >> >>> Does this testcase hotplug cpu 0 off? >>> >>> >> No, i don't think so. It skips cpu0 during online/offline >> process. >> > > Then how could this happen ? Looks like cpu 0 is offline .... > 0:mon> <4>IRQ 17 affinity broken off cpu 0 > <4>IRQ 18 affinity broken off cpu 0 > <4>IRQ 19 affinity broken off cpu 0 > <4>IRQ 264 affinity broken off cpu 0 > <4>cpu 0 (hwid 0) Ready to die... > <7>clockevent: decrementer mult[83126e97] shift[32] cpu[0] > Sorry i was looking at only one script. Looking more closely at the test there are 6 different sub tests. The rest of the tests do seem to hotplug CPU 0. Thanks -Sachin -- --------------------------------- Sachin Sant IBM Linux Technology Center India Systems and Technology Labs Bangalore, India --------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists