lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:27:29 -0800
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
CC:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] pci: update pci bridge resource to get more big	range
 for devices under it - v13

Alex Chiang wrote:
> Hi Yinghai,
> 
> * Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>:
>>> -v13: change resource_list to resource_list_x, to save size and flags
>>> aside, otherwise grandchild res will get confused with son's res as
>>> could be used
> 
> One difficulty that I have in reviewing is the multiple patch
> revisions buried deep within a thread.
> 
> Blame my small brain for not being able to keep track of all
> the revision-as-mail-responses in one coherent body of work.
> 
>> Patches 4-6 make me the most nervous, since they have the potential of
>> really changing our resource allocation (hopefully for the better) on
>> many platforms.
>>
>> Linus, can you check them out and see if you're ok with the direction?
>>
>> Patches 7-9 seem like they've recieved some review from Alex and
>> Kenji-san, but I don't see acks or reviewed-bys on them.
>>
>> Alex and Kenji-san, are you ok with them assuming the previous patches
>> or something like them go upstream?
> 
> Can you please repost your next revision (after taking Jesse's
> review comments) in a new thread?
> 

can you check


git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/yinghai/linux-2.6-yinghai.git >> master

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/yinghai/linux-2.6-yinghai.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/master

i rebased them to linus tree 12-12-2009.

Thanks

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ