linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: Convert BUG() to use unreachable()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:58:08 +0000
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
Cc:	Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@...opsys.COM>,
	"gcc@....gnu.org" <gcc@....gnu.org>,
	Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@...il.com>,
	David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Convert BUG() to use unreachable()

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 07:48:37PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Given the lack of progress/bug reporting on ARM uclinux, the lack of
> platform support and the lack of configurations, my view is that there
> is no one actually using it.  I know that I don't particularly take any
> care with respect to uclinux when making changes to the MMU based kernels.
> Why bother if apparantly no one's using it?

Jamie,

As you seem to be a user of uclinux on ARM, could you help ensure that
the support there is bug fixed and we at least have a configuration file
which kautobuild can use to provide feedback on the build status of
uclinux on ARM please?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/