linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] nfs: fix ISO C90 warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:58:13 -0500
From:	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
To:	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] nfs: fix ISO C90 warning

On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 18:00 +0800, Américo Wang wrote: 
> Hi,
> Check that currently all usages of RPC_DEBUG are the same,
> we can replace them all.
> 
> What do you think about the attached patch?
> 
> Sorry for attaching it, I have a bad mail environment here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>

Doesn't that approach instead lead to a lot of 'unreferenced variable'
warnings in the '#undef RPC_DEBUG' case?

Cheers
  Trond

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/